<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Sides Best of 2006 Extravaganza: Top 5 Hip-Hop/Rap Albums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/</link>
	<description>a little bit of a and a little bit of b</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T-Sides &#187; Blog Archive &#187; T-Sides&#8217; 2007 in Review: Top Albums - the &#8220;Best&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-25303</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Sides &#187; Blog Archive &#187; T-Sides&#8217; 2007 in Review: Top Albums - the &#8220;Best&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-25303</guid>
		<description>[...] completely, utterly surprised, right? Believe it or not, this spot was the hardest. It was almost Devendra Banhart, Kanye West, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] completely, utterly surprised, right? Believe it or not, this spot was the hardest. It was almost Devendra Banhart, Kanye West, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-758</guid>
		<description>Nas &amp; The Game are the big rap/hip-hop releases that I didn&#039;t get a chance to hear, but I&#039;m planning to do so in the near future, so I may end up revising this list, hah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nas &#038; The Game are the big rap/hip-hop releases that I didn&#8217;t get a chance to hear, but I&#8217;m planning to do so in the near future, so I may end up revising this list, hah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-755</guid>
		<description>have you checked out Nas yet, and was he excluded for a reason?  i&#039;m a fan of kingdom come, but the best jay-z track of the year is on nas&#039;s album, not on KC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you checked out Nas yet, and was he excluded for a reason?  i&#8217;m a fan of kingdom come, but the best jay-z track of the year is on nas&#8217;s album, not on KC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-748</guid>
		<description>I think, for the most part, the terms are used pretty interchangeably, but I generally make a separation.  I couldn&#039;t describe how I would categorize either if pressed, but I do consider each to have a different aesthetic.

The Roots are absolutely a good example of a group I would call hip-hop.  The Black-Eyed Peas have always seemed like a hybrid of dance and hip-hop/rap to me more than straight up rap/hip-hop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, for the most part, the terms are used pretty interchangeably, but I generally make a separation.  I couldn&#8217;t describe how I would categorize either if pressed, but I do consider each to have a different aesthetic.</p>
<p>The Roots are absolutely a good example of a group I would call hip-hop.  The Black-Eyed Peas have always seemed like a hybrid of dance and hip-hop/rap to me more than straight up rap/hip-hop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-747</guid>
		<description>i just want to point out that the roots (the very definition of modern hip-hop with a conscious look back to the originators) put out their first album in &#039;93 &amp; their major-label debut was &#039;95. even though they didn&#039;t break into mainstream consciousness until erykah badu guested on their &#039;99 album, &#039;things fall apart&#039;, they&#039;ve been around for awhile. granted, their post-2000 work up to &#039;game theory&#039; has had a harder edge (the temporary loss of malik b?), but they don&#039;t really work for the point of the comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just want to point out that the roots (the very definition of modern hip-hop with a conscious look back to the originators) put out their first album in &#8216;93 &amp; their major-label debut was &#8216;95. even though they didn&#8217;t break into mainstream consciousness until erykah badu guested on their &#8216;99 album, &#8216;things fall apart&#8217;, they&#8217;ve been around for awhile. granted, their post-2000 work up to &#8216;game theory&#8217; has had a harder edge (the temporary loss of malik b?), but they don&#8217;t really work for the point of the comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy F.</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-735</guid>
		<description>The difference between rap and hip-hop has always been something that I&#039;ve been confused about.  What qualifies a song in either genre?  I&#039;m starting to think the artists themselves dont know, because as you mentioned, they are jumping over boundries with their music too.  

Then a group like Gnarles Barkley or OutKast comes in and combines everything and no ones sure what&#039;s up or down anymore.  Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that.  In fact, it&#039;s great.  Mixing and playing with genres is what made David Bowie so great.  It&#039;s what made Beck the Bowie of our times, and it&#039;s what keeps many artists fresh.  


And yes, the flashy is mostly mainstream, but even some of the current mainstream flashy were once alternative and indie rappers.  The best example here is the Black Eyed Peas.  For those that do not know, they had two (pretty good) albums before Elephunk hit big and everyone was singing &quot;Where is the love? (feat. Justin Timberlake)&quot;.  Now they were never a serrious group; it&#039;s not like they were singing about how there are people on welfare or anything, but they were never the &quot;lets sing about slapping hos and doing drugs&quot; rappers either.  They just made fun dance songs.  At least not until Fergie joined the group and they released Elephunk.  Then they embrased the mainstream and the flashy-ness.  They recorded &quot;Let&#039;s get retarded&quot; and {shudder} &quot;My humps&quot;.  It&#039;s almost like their whole sound changed when they went flashy.  This is a shining example of an indie group going flashy, but is this the way it always is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between rap and hip-hop has always been something that I&#8217;ve been confused about.  What qualifies a song in either genre?  I&#8217;m starting to think the artists themselves dont know, because as you mentioned, they are jumping over boundries with their music too.  </p>
<p>Then a group like Gnarles Barkley or OutKast comes in and combines everything and no ones sure what&#8217;s up or down anymore.  Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that.  In fact, it&#8217;s great.  Mixing and playing with genres is what made David Bowie so great.  It&#8217;s what made Beck the Bowie of our times, and it&#8217;s what keeps many artists fresh.  </p>
<p>And yes, the flashy is mostly mainstream, but even some of the current mainstream flashy were once alternative and indie rappers.  The best example here is the Black Eyed Peas.  For those that do not know, they had two (pretty good) albums before Elephunk hit big and everyone was singing &#8220;Where is the love? (feat. Justin Timberlake)&#8221;.  Now they were never a serrious group; it&#8217;s not like they were singing about how there are people on welfare or anything, but they were never the &#8220;lets sing about slapping hos and doing drugs&#8221; rappers either.  They just made fun dance songs.  At least not until Fergie joined the group and they released Elephunk.  Then they embrased the mainstream and the flashy-ness.  They recorded &#8220;Let&#8217;s get retarded&#8221; and {shudder} &#8220;My humps&#8221;.  It&#8217;s almost like their whole sound changed when they went flashy.  This is a shining example of an indie group going flashy, but is this the way it always is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Well, I think an important difference between the flashy artists you talk about and the non-flashy is that a lot of the non-flashy artists you refer to fall more in the hip-hop category.  Even though I&#039;ve blurred the lines with this post, I think there&#039;s noticeable difference between the artists considered hip-hop and the artists considered rap.  It&#039;s kind of become a thing now, where, hip-hop artists are deemed the more serious of the two (which is possibly why a lot of flashier artists keep calling their music hip-hop -- to try and perhaps seem more serious?)  I&#039;m not saying I necessarily agree with this, that&#039;s just how the trend seems to be working lately. Also, a lot of the flashier artists are more mainstream, which is an important note, I think. It&#039;s absolutely possible to make rap/hip-hop music with a message -- there&#039;s plenty of it, and as I&#039;ve written above, I tend to prefer it -- but the people who do are often not the ones who rise up the charts... not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that.  I like to shake my ass as much as the next person.

You&#039;re absolutely right about Jay-Z, and I didn&#039;t mean to suggest that all rap is meant to be danced to at a club.  What I should&#039;ve said is that a lot of &lt;b&gt;mainstream&lt;/b&gt; rap/hip-hop -- particularly since 2000 -- seems to have that aim.  Jay-Z has always been good at combining the two, as you say.  Still, this album is less dance-party friendly than his others, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think an important difference between the flashy artists you talk about and the non-flashy is that a lot of the non-flashy artists you refer to fall more in the hip-hop category.  Even though I&#8217;ve blurred the lines with this post, I think there&#8217;s noticeable difference between the artists considered hip-hop and the artists considered rap.  It&#8217;s kind of become a thing now, where, hip-hop artists are deemed the more serious of the two (which is possibly why a lot of flashier artists keep calling their music hip-hop &#8212; to try and perhaps seem more serious?)  I&#8217;m not saying I necessarily agree with this, that&#8217;s just how the trend seems to be working lately. Also, a lot of the flashier artists are more mainstream, which is an important note, I think. It&#8217;s absolutely possible to make rap/hip-hop music with a message &#8212; there&#8217;s plenty of it, and as I&#8217;ve written above, I tend to prefer it &#8212; but the people who do are often not the ones who rise up the charts&#8230; not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that.  I like to shake my ass as much as the next person.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right about Jay-Z, and I didn&#8217;t mean to suggest that all rap is meant to be danced to at a club.  What I should&#8217;ve said is that a lot of <b>mainstream</b> rap/hip-hop &#8212; particularly since 2000 &#8212; seems to have that aim.  Jay-Z has always been good at combining the two, as you say.  Still, this album is less dance-party friendly than his others, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy F.</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Just a few thoughts using your own quotes. 

&quot;But this isnâ€™t Rolling Stone, and Iâ€™m not about to give 4 stars to any album from any veteran of any genre only because theyâ€™re a veteran.&quot; 

Thank God.  And thank God this isn&#039;t pitchfork and you do the complete opposite and give a 4.5 (out of 10) to any album from any veteran of any genre only because they&#039;re a veteran. 



&quot;More than anything, rap of 2000 and beyond is all about being flashy. The drug-dealing, crime committing lifestyle is still there, but itâ€™s not the focus anymore. Lately itâ€™s all about the women, the cars, the watches, the champagne that come as a result (Clipse anyone? Oh, Iâ€™ll get to them). Rap has been as much about partying and dancing as dance music.&quot;

I was trying to think of an example to use to prove you wrong here, but I keep on contradicting myself.  But I think I&#039;ve got something:  Not all rap post-2000 is about being flashy, or the women, the cars, the watches, etc.  Post-2000 we&#039;ve had a rise (at least to a certain extent) in the alternative rap scene.  Artists like Jurassic 5, The Roots, Mike Skinner/The Streets (I call him rap), Dizzee Rascall (however it&#039;s spelt), etc etc have downplayed those elements (the spoils of the genre if you will) and taken radically different approaches, showing political sides, urban problems and offering profound opinions on topics not often seen in rap.  In fact, these artists are harping back to some of raps important pioneers, specifically Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five, who used the genre to showcase the problems of the black communities.  Now of course, this has gotten tainted as well, as the flashy performers took on these issues.  Nas, Kanye, Jay-Z, Eminem, etc.  (And here&#039;s where I contradict myself and agree with you)  These performers didnt always rap about partying, instead offered the more serious topics, but skewed them with their own flashly elements.  Kanye West talked about Jesus and how he&#039;s absent from rap songs, and that he cant get commercial success from rapping about him, yet aside from subject matter, Kanye did absolutly nothing different than Puffy.  No one has made Jesus more flashy than Kanye West.  

And Im pretty sure I&#039;ve just invalidated my own point again.  Look what happens when I just go rambling on.  Taylor, this is why you were such a great editor:  if I submitted this to you, it would somehow magically end up coherent by the following Thursday.  

 
&quot;This isnâ€™t music to play in the background at a club, this is music to listen to. It may not be his forte, and it may not be what rap is supposed to be all about.&quot;  

Jay Z has always had a ballance between music made to be listened to and music for the clubs.  While &quot;Dirt off your shoulders&quot; would be a great dance hit, &quot;99 Problems&quot; would be the most important and personal song of the year.  It is one of his fortes; Or rather, it was.  

And as I rambled on about before, rap has always had that personal and and important aspect the was meant more for the analysising than dancing.  From &quot;The Message&quot; and &quot;White Lines&quot; to &quot;Stan&quot;.  Rap has proven to be just as versitile a genre as rock and soul before it.    



&quot;dear rappers, stop with the fucking skits already. love, Taylor T-Sides.&quot;  

Here Here!  Honestly, they&#039;re just stupid and childish now.  &quot;The College Dropout&quot; and &quot;Behind the Front&quot; are two of my favorite rap albums and I always have to skip ahead when ever a skit comes on.  They&#039;re not clever, they&#039;re just bad.  



This has been another installment of Billy making no sense at 3 in the morning.  I hope you all enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few thoughts using your own quotes. </p>
<p>&#8220;But this isnâ€™t Rolling Stone, and Iâ€™m not about to give 4 stars to any album from any veteran of any genre only because theyâ€™re a veteran.&#8221; </p>
<p>Thank God.  And thank God this isn&#8217;t pitchfork and you do the complete opposite and give a 4.5 (out of 10) to any album from any veteran of any genre only because they&#8217;re a veteran. </p>
<p>&#8220;More than anything, rap of 2000 and beyond is all about being flashy. The drug-dealing, crime committing lifestyle is still there, but itâ€™s not the focus anymore. Lately itâ€™s all about the women, the cars, the watches, the champagne that come as a result (Clipse anyone? Oh, Iâ€™ll get to them). Rap has been as much about partying and dancing as dance music.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was trying to think of an example to use to prove you wrong here, but I keep on contradicting myself.  But I think I&#8217;ve got something:  Not all rap post-2000 is about being flashy, or the women, the cars, the watches, etc.  Post-2000 we&#8217;ve had a rise (at least to a certain extent) in the alternative rap scene.  Artists like Jurassic 5, The Roots, Mike Skinner/The Streets (I call him rap), Dizzee Rascall (however it&#8217;s spelt), etc etc have downplayed those elements (the spoils of the genre if you will) and taken radically different approaches, showing political sides, urban problems and offering profound opinions on topics not often seen in rap.  In fact, these artists are harping back to some of raps important pioneers, specifically Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five, who used the genre to showcase the problems of the black communities.  Now of course, this has gotten tainted as well, as the flashy performers took on these issues.  Nas, Kanye, Jay-Z, Eminem, etc.  (And here&#8217;s where I contradict myself and agree with you)  These performers didnt always rap about partying, instead offered the more serious topics, but skewed them with their own flashly elements.  Kanye West talked about Jesus and how he&#8217;s absent from rap songs, and that he cant get commercial success from rapping about him, yet aside from subject matter, Kanye did absolutly nothing different than Puffy.  No one has made Jesus more flashy than Kanye West.  </p>
<p>And Im pretty sure I&#8217;ve just invalidated my own point again.  Look what happens when I just go rambling on.  Taylor, this is why you were such a great editor:  if I submitted this to you, it would somehow magically end up coherent by the following Thursday.  </p>
<p>&#8220;This isnâ€™t music to play in the background at a club, this is music to listen to. It may not be his forte, and it may not be what rap is supposed to be all about.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Jay Z has always had a ballance between music made to be listened to and music for the clubs.  While &#8220;Dirt off your shoulders&#8221; would be a great dance hit, &#8220;99 Problems&#8221; would be the most important and personal song of the year.  It is one of his fortes; Or rather, it was.  </p>
<p>And as I rambled on about before, rap has always had that personal and and important aspect the was meant more for the analysising than dancing.  From &#8220;The Message&#8221; and &#8220;White Lines&#8221; to &#8220;Stan&#8221;.  Rap has proven to be just as versitile a genre as rock and soul before it.    </p>
<p>&#8220;dear rappers, stop with the fucking skits already. love, Taylor T-Sides.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Here Here!  Honestly, they&#8217;re just stupid and childish now.  &#8220;The College Dropout&#8221; and &#8220;Behind the Front&#8221; are two of my favorite rap albums and I always have to skip ahead when ever a skit comes on.  They&#8217;re not clever, they&#8217;re just bad.  </p>
<p>This has been another installment of Billy making no sense at 3 in the morning.  I hope you all enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-729</guid>
		<description>no, that was Blue Scholars :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, that was Blue Scholars <img src='http://www.t-sides.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOM</title>
		<link>http://www.t-sides.com/2007/01/01/t-sides-best-of-2006-extravaganza-top-5-hip-hoprap-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>DOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.t-sides.com/?p=104#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Is Blue Sky/Black Death the one you played (tried to anyway) on the way to CT? The one we listened to on the way back on Friday?  The Seattle group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Blue Sky/Black Death the one you played (tried to anyway) on the way to CT? The one we listened to on the way back on Friday?  The Seattle group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
